Data extraction, according to our users, can be a difficult aspect of the systematic review process.
Data extraction is the process of locating and extracting data from study reports so that similar data from multiple sources can be analyzed. It's an essential component of any methodical or scientific review process, as it enables you to assemble a large sufficient dataset to (hopefully!) provide meaningful evidence.
It's essential to schedule out the process before you start and clearly explain and record your inclusion and exclusion criteria that are likely to grab the information that will help answer your research question, as well as how to set up your data extraction form to capture this information effectively. This can be anything from a simple outline to a published, peer-reviewed protocol; however, you present it, it's important to plan out your process before you start and clearly define and document your inclusion and exclusion criteria that are likely to capture the data that will help.
Create a system for testing your strategy and communicating with your co-reviewers. Each phase of the review process should be piloted, beginning with screening to ensure that all assessors are aware of and agree on the criteria. When beginning data extraction, a second-round is useful to check that the team is gathering the data required for an efficient analysis (and also that all reviewers are extracting data consistently). Piloting quality evaluation guarantees that all examiners are familiar with and agree on the rating methodology.
It's critical to maintain writing precisely why you're doing it and how you're doing it as you start to put your theory into action. It's vital to be open about your approach so that even if another reviewer followed it, they'd receive the same result. It may even be important to modify principles and requirements to the requirements of your enterprise or discipline, so be as transparent as possible about how you arrived at your judgments, whatever informed you, and any change requests you made.
The process frequently takes significantly longer than anyone expects; it's critical to factor in anticipated delays in the project schedule. Set precise targets and deadlines to allow your team to check in, examine what you've all done so far, and address any issues that have occurred and how to best fix them during the pilot phase.
When conducting a research study or systematic review for the very first time, there is a lot to learn and grasp; guidance or mentoring from somebody who has accomplished it before will make all the difference in completing the process effectively. They can function as just an independent reviewer to ensure that your team's screening or extraction is up to standard, or they can collaborate directly with you to make procedure and process choices. Your procedure will be less stressful and more productive with the help of a mentor.
Looking for the more tips of extracting reviews systematically? Contact ReviewGators today!!